Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Marek Gengel vs Max Benaim Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gengel vs Benaim analysis and find out who is favored!
Marek Gengel vs Max Benaim Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gengel 1 - 0 Benaim
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gengel has won 54.39% of points on their second serve, while Benaim has won 41.5%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gengel, in recent form, has won 52.76% of their opponent's second serve points, while Benaim has won 44.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.42% and 29.97% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gengel has saved 66.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Benaim has saved 63.64% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gengel has won 63.79% of matches played (W/L 37/ 21), with Benaim winning 50% (W/L 20/ 20) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gengel has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 65% (W/L 205/ 111), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 2). Benaim has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 53% (W/L 41/ 37), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 5).
- Player level: In the last year, Gengel has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 68.52% of matches (W/L 37/ 17), where as Benaim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 20/ 20). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Gengel winning 1 times and Benaim being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Gengel winning 2 and Benaim winning 0. The last match between Gengel and Benaim was at the M25 Heraklion, 30-11-2023, Second, Hard with Marek Gengel getting the victory 6-1 6-2.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:11:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gengel and Benaim have played a deciding set 0 times, with Gengel winning 0 times and Benaim 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Gengel winning 0, and Benaim 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gengel has played against opponents with an average rank of 138.47 while Benaim has played against players with an average rank of 45.67.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gengel has won 54% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Benaim has won 22% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gengel has converted 43% of breakpoint opportunities, and Benaim has converted 40% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
520
Rank
256
High
28
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
26
Age
Plays
L
L
W
W
W
L
W
L
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
W
W
L
57% (306-234)
Career Total W/L
44% (46-59)
71% (30-12)
YTD W/L
46% (6-7)
$3,280
Career Prize Money
$0
3
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Marek Gengel | Max Benaim |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 12 | 3 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 0 | 2 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:11:0 | 1:11:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 79% (26/33) | 49% (29/59) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 88% (23/26) | 48% (14/29) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 71% (5/7) | 40% (12/30) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 45% (5/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Points W% | 56% (33/59) | 15% (5/33) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-1 6-2 |
Stats 
Marek Gengel
Player
Max Benaim
79%
(
26 of
33)
1st Serve %
49%
(
29 of
59)
2
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
45%
(
5 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
15%
(
5 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
33 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
31
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Marek Gengel | Max Benaim |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 71% (30/12) | 46% (6/7) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 69% (65/29) | 50% (14/14) |
| Games Win/Loss | 57% (506/380) | 51% (132/128) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 71% (30/12) | 45% (5/6) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.47 | 0.07 |
| Aces Total | 203 | 9 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.11 |
| DFs Total | 86 | 14 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:29:30 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 142.9 | 51 |
| 1st Serve % | 69% (1815/2647) | 66% (288/435) |
| 1st Serve W% | 72% (1313/1815) | 64% (183/288) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 54% (452/831) | 41% (61/147) |
| BPs Won% Total | 43% (126/293) | 40% (12/30) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (1134/2744) | 35% (152/434) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 71% (30/12) | 46% (6/7) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 73% (30/41) | 46% (6/13) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 44% (4/9) | 50% (1/2) |
| Deciding Set W% | 55% (6/11) | 0% (0/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 90% (31/28) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 10% (31/3) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (7/0) |
Marek Gengel Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Orel Kimhi
Player
Marek Gengel
76%
(
71 of
93)
1st Serve %
64%
(
49 of
77)
1
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
2
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
32 of
49)
64%
(
14 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
18%
(
2 of
11)
39%
(
36 of
93)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
87
Total Points Won
83
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Ofek Shimanov
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve %
67%
(
34 of
51)
4
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
2
71%
(
24 of
34)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
69%
(
9 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-4 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-0 6-3 | H2H | |||
| SF |
Stats
Ilia Simakin
Player
Marek Gengel
60%
(
74 of
124)
1st Serve %
72%
(
104 of
145)
18
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
4
82%
(
61 of
74)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
77 of
104)
66%
(
33 of
50)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
23 of
41)
0%
(
0 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
24%
(
30 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
45 of
145)
139
Total Points Won
130
|
7-6(4) 6-7(6) 7-6(8) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Bekkhan Atlangeriev
70%
(
85 of
122)
1st Serve %
56%
(
58 of
103)
10
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
61 of
85)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
44 of
58)
51%
(
19 of
37)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
22%
(
2 of
9)
34%
(
42 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
33 of
103)
113
Total Points Won
112
|
6-4 5-7 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Aleksandre Metreveli
72%
(
39 of
54)
1st Serve %
61%
(
25 of
41)
7
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
54)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
21 of
41)
59
Total Points Won
36
|
6-0 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Marek Gengel
Player
Kirill Filaretov
59%
(
29 of
49)
1st Serve %
57%
(
33 of
58)
7
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
86%
(
25 of
29)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
75%
(
15 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
40%
(
2 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
23 of
58)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Giles Hussey
Player
Marek Gengel
70%
(
64 of
91)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
6
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
72%
(
46 of
64)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
38%
(
3 of
8)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
30 of
72)
87
Total Points Won
76
|
4-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Kamil Majchrzak
Player
Marek Gengel
71%
(
80 of
113)
1st Serve %
70%
(
78 of
111)
9
Aces
10
3
Double Faults
2
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
78)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
34%
(
38 of
113)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
38 of
111)
113
Total Points Won
111
|
6-3 5-7 7-6(7) | H2H | ||
view more
Max Benaim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Ricardo Rodriguez-Pace
Player
Max Benaim
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
55%
(
24 of
44)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
35 of
57)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
39%
(
30 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
23 of
44)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-1 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q1 | 6-2 3-6 10-8 | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Joseph Phillips
Player
Max Benaim
75%
(
66 of
88)
1st Serve %
84%
(
87 of
104)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
1
58%
(
38 of
66)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
48 of
87)
55%
(
12 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
30%
(
6 of
20)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
43%
(
38 of
88)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
50 of
104)
100
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 2-6 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 | 7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | |||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mattias Southcombe
Player
Max Benaim
67%
(
64 of
96)
1st Serve %
58%
(
46 of
79)
11
Aces
5
7
Double Faults
2
75%
(
48 of
64)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
33 of
46)
50%
(
16 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
58%
(
19 of
33)
17%
(
1 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
33%
(
32 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
27 of
79)
91
Total Points Won
84
|
7-5 7-6(5) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Amr Elsayed
Player
Max Benaim
60%
(
26 of
43)
1st Serve %
72%
(
55 of
76)
5
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
76)
70
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Karim Ibrahim
Player
Max Benaim
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
57%
(
25 of
44)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
96%
(
22 of
23)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
16 of
25)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
7 of
19)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
7 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
21 of
44)
53
Total Points Won
30
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-3 6-4 | H2H | |||
view more
Gengel Vs Benaim Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gengel are available here and Benaim photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Marek Gengel
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
